Facts checked 28 September 2026 ✓ Fact-checked Add as a preferred source on Google

Lay-by in South Africa: Your Money, the Shop’s Risk and the Double Refund

☆ Save
Lay-by in South Africa: Your Money, the Shop’s Risk and the Double Refund — Rateweb

Lay-by is how a very large number of South African households buy anything expensive. You pick the fridge, the lounge suite or the school uniforms, pay it off over a few months, and collect when it is settled. No credit check, no interest, no debt record.

What most people paying off a lay-by do not know is that the law treats those payments quite differently from how the shop tends to describe them. The money is not the shop's. The goods are not your problem if something happens to them. And if the store cannot hand over what you paid for, the default remedy is not a refund — it is double.

All of that is section 62 of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008, and it is one of the shorter and clearer sections in South African consumer law.

Your instalments remain your property

Section 62(1) says two things about a lay-by, and both are worth reading slowly.

"each amount paid by the consumer to the supplier remains the property of the consumer"

until the goods are delivered, and

"the particular goods remain at the risk of the supplier until the goods have been delivered."

The first half means your instalments are not the shop's revenue while the lay-by runs. They are your money, held by them. That is why a lay-by is not a credit agreement, why it does not appear on your credit record, and why no interest is charged.

The second half is the part that matters when something goes wrong. If the warehouse floods, if the stockroom is burgled, if the item is damaged in storage or the branch burns down — that is the supplier's loss, not yours. You do not lose your instalments and you do not lose your right to the goods. Risk only passes to you on delivery.

This is the opposite of what people assume. A shopper who has paid R4,000 towards a R6,000 fridge and is told the fridge was stolen tends to think they have lost something. They have not. They are entitled to a fridge, or to their money — and possibly to considerably more.

If the shop cannot deliver: the double remedy

Section 62(2) opens:

"If a supplier is unable to deliver any goods contemplated in subsection (1) when the consumer has paid the full price for those goods, the supplier must either, at the option of the consumer —"

That phrase decides who is in charge. The choice is yours, not the store's.

Option (a) is that the supplier must "supply the consumer with an equivalent quantity of goods that are comparable or superior in description, design or quality". Note comparable or superior. A shop may not settle a lay-by on a discontinued premium model by handing you the cheap replacement.

Option (b) is a refund, and it splits in two:

  • (b)(i) — a refund of everything you paid, with interest at the prescribed rate, where the inability to supply is "due to circumstances beyond the supplier's control".
  • (b)(ii) — double the amount you paid, as compensation for breach, "in any circumstances not contemplated in subparagraph (i)".

Read that ordering carefully, because retail staff routinely get it backwards. Double is the general rule. The refund-with-interest is the exception, available to the supplier only where the failure was genuinely beyond its control.

And section 62(3) narrows that exception further:

"A shortage of stock is not to be considered beyond the supplier's control if the shortage results partially, completely, directly or indirectly from a failure on the part of the supplier to adequately and diligently carry out any ordinary or routine matter."

So poor stock management is not an act of God. A branch that simply sold your lay-by item to a walk-in customer, or failed to reorder, or lost it in a stocktake, has not satisfied section 62(3), and the consumer's remedy under (b)(ii) is double.

The interest in (b)(i), incidentally, is calculated under the Prescribed Rate of Interest Act, which sets the default rate at the Reserve Bank's repo rate plus 3,5 percentage points.

If you cancel: the penalty, and its two limits

Life happens, and lay-bys get abandoned. Section 62(4) deals with that:

if the consumer terminates the agreement early, or fails to complete payment within 60 business days after the anticipated date of completion, the supplier may charge a termination penalty, and "must refund to the consumer any amount paid" after deducting that penalty.

Three things follow.

You get your money back, less a penalty. Not nothing. The default position when a lay-by lapses is a refund of the balance after the deduction — not forfeiture of everything you have paid. A store policy that says "lay-by payments are non-refundable" cannot override the Act.

Sixty business days is a long grace period. The clock does not start at the last instalment date. It starts at the anticipated date of completion, and then runs a further sixty business days — roughly three calendar months. A lay-by is not cancelled because you missed a month.

The penalty must have been disclosed up front. Section 62(5) removes the supplier's right to charge a penalty at all unless it "informed the consumer of the fact and extent of the penalty before the consumer entered into the lay-by agreement". If it was not on the agreement you signed, and nobody told you, there is no penalty to deduct.

Section 62(5) also carves out two situations where no penalty may be charged whatever was disclosed: where the failure to complete the payments resulted from the death or hospitalisation of the consumer.

Section 62(6) allows the Minister to prescribe the basis for calculating a maximum penalty. Ask the retailer to show you, in writing, both what its penalty is and what it is calculated on — the disclosure obligation in 62(5) is your leverage.

What to do at the till, and afterwards

Before you start a lay-by

  • Get the agreement in writing, with the item clearly described, including model or SKU. "Comparable or superior" is much easier to enforce when the original is specified.
  • Find the termination penalty on the document. If it is not there, section 62(5) says it cannot be charged.
  • Check the anticipated completion date, because that is the date the sixty-business-day grace period runs from.

While it is running

  • Keep every receipt. Your claim is for "the amount paid by the consumer", and you prove that with receipts.
  • Take a photograph of the agreement. Lay-bys are often recorded on a card the store keeps.

If the shop cannot deliver

  • The choice between replacement goods and money is yours under section 62(2).
  • If you take money, the starting point is double what you paid. The supplier must show that its inability to supply was beyond its control to reduce that to a refund plus interest — and section 62(3) makes ordinary stock failures unavailable as an excuse.
  • Put the demand in writing and keep a copy.

If it is not resolved

Escalate to the National Consumer Commission, or to the relevant industry ombud where the retailer is a participant. A provincial consumer affairs office is often the fastest route for a retail dispute of this size. Bring the agreement, the receipts and your written demand.

How lay-by differs from the alternatives

It is worth being clear about what you are choosing when you pick lay-by over the other ways to pay for something expensive.

Lay-by Store credit / instalment sale Debit order savings plan
Governed by CPA s62 National Credit Act Contract and bank rules
Do you get the goods first? No Yes No
Interest and fees None Interest, initiation and service fees None, and you may earn some
Credit check No Yes No
Appears on your credit record No Yes No
Who carries the risk on the goods The supplier You N/A
If you stop paying Refund less a disclosed penalty Repossession and a listing You keep your savings

The trade-off is plain: lay-by costs nothing and cannot damage your credit record, but you wait. Instalment credit gets you the fridge today and puts a regulated credit agreement on your record, with interest capped under the NCA.

For related consumer rights on goods that turn out to be faulty after you have taken delivery — a different section of the same Act, with its own six-month clock — see our guide to the defective goods right. Retailers wanting to know what the CPA requires of them will find the supplier side in Consumer Protection Act obligations for a small business.

Frequently asked

The shop says my lay-by payments are non-refundable. Is that legal? No. Section 62(4) requires the supplier to refund what you paid after deducting a termination penalty, and section 62(5) says the penalty cannot be charged at all unless it was disclosed before you entered into the agreement.

My lay-by item was stolen from the store. What happens? The goods remain at the supplier's risk until delivery. You are entitled to comparable or superior goods, or to a refund — and if the loss was not beyond the supplier's control, to double what you paid.

I missed two months of payments. Have I lost the lay-by? Not necessarily. The supplier's right to terminate arises if you fail to complete payment within sixty business days after the anticipated completion date. Before that, catching up is usually possible.

Can the store make me take a different model? Only if it is comparable or superior in description, design or quality — and only if you choose the replacement over a refund. The election under section 62(2) is expressly the consumer's.

I had to go to hospital and could not finish paying. Can they still charge a penalty? No. Section 62(5) removes the penalty where the failure to complete the payments resulted from the consumer's death or hospitalisation.

Does a lay-by affect my credit score? No. It is not a credit agreement, no credit check is done, and nothing is reported to the credit bureaus.

Tools to act on this today

SD
Shephard Dube · Co-founder
Shephard Dube is a co-founder of Rateweb. He holds a Bachelor of Laws (LLB) and works as an entrepreneur and academic. He reviews Rateweb's credit and regulatory coverage — the Nat... This article is general information, not personalised financial advice.
More from Shephard Dube →

Related on Rateweb