Unveiling the Complex Dance of Divorce and Retirement Funds

  • Complex Legal Framework: Divorce and retirement funds in South Africa are governed by a complex interplay of laws, including the Pension Funds Act and the Divorce Act, alongside considerations of marital property regimes.
  • Dependence on Active Membership: Access to a member's pension interest by a non-member spouse hinges on the active status of the member in their fund at the time of divorce, regardless of whether the benefits remain within the fund.
  • Marital Property Regimes and Tax Implications: The type of marital property regime, such as in community of property or out of community of property with or without accrual, determines the extent of the non-member spouse's claim to pension interest. Additionally, tax considerations affect the distribution of pension interests, offering options such as cash lump sums or tax-free transfers to approved retirement funds.
Divorce and Retirement Funds

In South Africa, the dissolution of marriage can have significant implications for retirement funds, particularly for divorcees who are members of such funds. While it might seem straightforward that a non-member spouse is entitled to a portion of the member’s pension, the reality is more complex, governed by a web of legislation including the Pension Funds Act, the Divorce Act, and even Islamic Law in certain cases.

Felicia Hlophe, a legal adviser at Allan Gray, sheds light on this intricate matter. According to Hlophe, the Divorce Act defines “pension interest” as the benefits to which a member would have been entitled if their membership in the fund ended on the date of divorce due to resignation. This definition underscores an essential point: only active members of an occupational fund have a pension interest. Consequently, non-member spouses of paid-up members cannot access any portion of the member’s benefit in the fund.

A recent High Court case exemplifies this complexity. In this case, a member of an occupational fund resigned from employment in May 2021 but retained pension benefits in the fund. Upon divorcing his non-member spouse in October 2021, the court awarded 50% of the member’s pension interest to the non-member spouse. However, the fund argued that no pension interest existed in the fund anymore, as the member had resigned before the divorce.

The court’s ruling highlighted a crucial dependency: a non-member spouse’s access to their spouse’s benefits hinges on divorce and the active status of the member in their fund. Even if benefits remain within the fund, access for non-member spouses is contingent upon these conditions.

Marital property regimes further complicate matters. For marriages without a prenuptial contract, the default regime is in community of property. Here, each spouse owns 50% of assets and liabilities in the joint estate. In contrast, marriages out of community of property without accrual entail each spouse retaining their respective assets, with no claims against each other’s assets. However, if accrual is included, the spouse with the larger estate must compensate the other for the difference.

The Divorce Act clarifies that for marriages out of community of property without accrual, where the marriage commenced on or after 1 November 1984, the non-member spouse has no claim for pension interest from the member’s retirement savings. This provision underscores the importance of understanding the nuances of marital property regimes in divorce proceedings.

In the process of divorce, members may request information from their occupational funds to ensure compliance with court orders or settlement agreements. It’s crucial that these documents accurately identify the retirement fund, specify the entitlement of the non-member spouse to “pension interest,” and detail the amount or percentage due to them. Moreover, the fund’s ability to implement a divorce order hinges on various factors, including the member’s active status and the adequacy of the order’s wording.

Tax considerations further complicate the distribution of pension interests. Non-member spouses may opt to receive their allocation as a cash lump sum, subject to tax deductions by the fund. Alternatively, they can transfer benefits to an approved retirement fund, a tax-free option for both parties.

Navigating the intersection of divorce and retirement funds requires a nuanced understanding of legal frameworks and individual circumstances. As such, seeking expert advice is paramount to ensure equitable outcomes for all parties involved.

Quick Poll

Related

Rateweb

South Africa’s primary source of financial tools and information

Contact Us

admin@rateweb.co.za

Disclaimer

Rateweb strives to keep its information accurate and up to date. This information may be different than what you see when you visit a financial institution, service provider or specific product’s site. All financial products, shopping products and services are presented without warranty. When evaluating offers, please review the financial institution’s Terms and Conditions.

Rateweb is not a financial service provider and should in no way be seen as one. In compiling the articles for our website due caution was exercised in an attempt to gather information from reliable and accurate sources. The articles are of a general nature and do not purport to offer specialised and or personalised financial or investment advice. Neither the author, nor the publisher, will accept any responsibility for losses, omissions, errors, fortunes or misfortunes that may be suffered by any person that acts or refrains from acting as a result of these articles.