SA Police Criticized for Failing GBV Victims

  • SAPS inefficiencies: 283 cases, including 77 GBV cases, struck off court roll due to issues like incomplete investigations.
  • Minister's response: Western Cape Minister Reagen Allen vows accountability, improvement plans, and engaging with SAPS and prosecutors.
  • Impact on victims: Victims denied justice, perpetuating impunity for perpetrators; urgent systemic improvements needed in SAPS.

In a recent report released by the Western Cape Department of Police Oversight and Community Safety, the South African Police Services (SAPS) have come under scrutiny for their inefficiencies in handling gender-based violence (GBV) cases and other criminal matters. The findings paint a grim picture of the challenges faced by victims of GBV and other violent crimes in the Western Cape region, raising concerns about the ability of the criminal justice system to deliver justice.

Between October 2022 and March 2023, the Western Cape Department of Police Oversight and Community Safety’s Court Watching Briefs (CWB) unit monitored a total of 283 cases at 33 courts linked to 82 SAPS stations across the province. Shockingly, 77 of these cases were GBV-related, indicating a significant issue in addressing this pressing problem. These cases were monitored with the aim of ensuring that justice was served promptly and efficiently.

Striking Off Cases Due to SAPS Inefficiencies

One of the most concerning revelations from the report is that 283 cases, including those related to GBV, were struck off the court roll due to SAPS inefficiencies. These cases represent real people who have been dismally failed by the South African Police Service and the entire criminal justice system.

The inefficiencies leading to the striking off of cases can be categorized as follows:

Categories of InefficienciesQuarter 3 and 4
Cases withdrawn because the dockets were not at court68
Cases withdrawn because the investigation was incomplete104
Cases withdrawn because forensic reports were outstanding26
Cases withdrawn because the accused were not brought to court1
Cases withdrawn because the witnesses were not subpoenaed7

These figures reveal the extent of the problem. Over 200 cases were withdrawn or struck off due to a range of issues, from missing dockets to incomplete investigations.

Gender-Based Violence Cases Under the Spotlight

Of the 283 cases monitored, 77 were related to gender-based violence. This particular category of cases requires special attention given the severity of the issue in South Africa. The report breaks down the inefficiencies in handling these GBV cases:

Categories of InefficienciesQuarter 3 and 4
Cases withdrawn because the dockets were not at court22
Cases withdrawn because the investigation was incomplete48
Witnesses not subpoenaed3
Accused not brought to court3
The lab report was outstanding1

The fact that almost 60% of GBV cases were withdrawn due to incomplete investigations is deeply concerning. It suggests a failure in the initial stages of these cases, which are vital for ensuring the safety and justice for victims of gender-based violence.

Problematic SAPS Stations

The report also highlights specific SAPS stations that stood out for their inefficiencies in handling cases. In the two quarters covered by the report, the top three police stations with dockets not at court were Knysna (6 cases), Vredendal (4 cases), and George (3 cases). These stations have come under scrutiny for their failure to provide necessary case documents to the courts in a timely manner.

For incomplete investigations, the top three police stations were Lutzville (12 cases), Kraaifontein (8 cases), and Kuilsriver (6 cases). These numbers indicate significant shortcomings in the investigative processes at these stations.

The Impact on Victims

The impact of these inefficiencies on victims cannot be overstated. Gender-based violence cases, in particular, require urgent and sensitive handling to ensure the safety and well-being of victims. When these cases are withdrawn or struck off due to inefficiencies, it not only denies justice to victims but also perpetuates a culture of impunity for perpetrators.

Minister’s Response

Western Cape Minister of Police Oversight and Community Safety, Reagen Allen, expressed deep concern over the statistics revealed in the report. He emphasized the real human toll behind these numbers, noting that these are not just cases but individuals who have been failed by the South African Police Service and the entire criminal justice system.

Minister Allen has pledged to take action in response to these findings. He plans to engage with the SAPS Provincial Commissioner, Lieutenant General Thembisile Patekile, to ensure that officers who have failed citizens are held accountable. He has also stressed the need for SAPS to develop an improvement plan to minimize the number of cases struck off the roll due to their inefficiencies.

Additionally, Minister Allen will engage with the Western Cape Director of Public Prosecutions, Advocate Nicolette Bell, to understand where the breakdowns are occurring in the coordination between investigators and prosecutors. The goal is to ensure that victims receive the justice and support they deserve.

The Call for Accountability and Improvement

The Western Cape Department of Police Oversight and Community Safety’s report serves as a stark reminder of the urgent need for systemic improvements within SAPS. The South African public is looking for accountability and action to address these shortcomings, particularly in cases of gender-based violence.

Minister Reagen Allen summed up the situation, stating, “We want to ensure that SAPS is credible and trustworthy while delivering a service that is professional and of the highest standard, and that protects and serves individuals often deeply affected by crime.” The path forward involves not just acknowledging the problems but actively working to eradicate these shortcomings to provide better protection and justice for victims.



South Africa’s primary source of financial tools and information

Contact Us


Rateweb strives to keep its information accurate and up to date. This information may be different than what you see when you visit a financial institution, service provider or specific product’s site. All financial products, shopping products and services are presented without warranty. When evaluating offers, please review the financial institution’s Terms and Conditions.

Rateweb is not a financial service provider and should in no way be seen as one. In compiling the articles for our website due caution was exercised in an attempt to gather information from reliable and accurate sources. The articles are of a general nature and do not purport to offer specialised and or personalised financial or investment advice. Neither the author, nor the publisher, will accept any responsibility for losses, omissions, errors, fortunes or misfortunes that may be suffered by any person that acts or refrains from acting as a result of these articles.