Categories: NewsTechnology
| On
2023-12-11 10:01 AM

South Africa’s Coastal Fishing Faces Drone Dilemma

  • Drone Fishing Emergence: South Africa witnesses a surge in drone fishing among recreational anglers, raising concerns due to its potential impact on fish stocks, coastal wildlife, and escalating conflicts among fishing groups.
  • Impact and Implications: The practice of drone fishing poses multifaceted challenges, including potential overexploitation of fishing grounds, threats to conservation-critical species like sharks, environmental hazards from lost fishing tackle, and socio-economic conflicts among different fishing communities.
  • Regulation and Management: Researchers, in collaboration with authorities, aim to regulate drone fishing following a public notice banning the use of drones for angling. Legal battles persist as drone fishing companies contest these regulations, highlighting the ongoing struggle to balance technological innovation, environmental conservation, and societal needs in South Africa's fishing industry.
By Miriam Matoma


In recent years, the recreational angling landscape in South Africa has witnessed a transformative addition: the advent of “drone fishing.” As a nation blessed with a sprawling 2,850km shoreline, fishing stands as a cherished sport and pastime among many South Africans, boasting an estimated count of approximately 400,000 shore-based marine anglers.

Over the last decade, researchers observing linefish populations – species caught using traditional hook and line methods – have taken note of a significant uptick in drone fishing practices. This shift was brought to their attention by concerned recreational fishers, raising valid apprehensions regarding its potential impact on fish stocks, coastal wildlife, and escalating conflicts among various fishing groups. Notably, fishing serves as a critical protein and income source for around 2,730 commercial fishers, 2,400 small-scale boat fishers, and 30,000 small-scale shore-based fishers across South Africa.

Addressing the need for investigation, researchers encountered a challenge: the lack of comprehensive monitoring and data on drone fishing practices.

Innovative Research and Revelations

Resorting to unconventional methodologies due to limitations imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers turned to online resources for insights. Social media platforms and Google Trends served as valuable tools, revealing a staggering 357% surge in interest in drone fishing post-2016. This surge coincided with the popularity of a viral YouTube video showcasing an angler using a drone to reel in a sizable longfin tuna off an Australian beach. Further exploration unveiled the dominance of “drone fishing” groups on Facebook, boasting over 17,000 members, while YouTube hosted 38,700 videos incorporating the term.

However, a crucial observation emerged: South Africa exhibited unique concerns compared to New Zealand and Australia, as drones primarily targeted sharks—species of grave conservation concern, notably the dusky shark. This highlighted potential threats posed by drone fishing to species requiring protection.

Assessing the Impact and Implications

Delving deeper, researchers scrutinized the multifaceted impacts of drone fishing:

Coastal Wildlife: Concerns escalated over the inadvertent consequences on marine creatures. The potential loss of fishing tackle and resultant debris in the ocean poses a threat to birds, marine mammals, and turtles through entanglement and environmental pollution.

Targeted Fish and Habitats: Drones equipped with cameras enable anglers to access distant fishing grounds, potentially overexploiting previously inaccessible areas. Moreover, fish captured and released in these zones face reduced survival rates due to exhaustion and vulnerability to predators.

Socio-Economic Dynamics: The exclusive accessibility of drone fishing to affluent anglers introduced conflicts with fishers dependent on catches for sustenance and livelihood. Additionally, sharing live fishing information online raised privacy concerns among other beachgoers.

Towards Regulation and Management

The absence of specific regulations pertaining to drone fishing prompted researchers to suggest indirect legislative measures. Collaboration with the South African Department of Forestry, Fisheries, and the Environment resulted in a 2022 public notice categorically prohibiting drones and similar remote devices for angling.

However, this regulatory move met resistance from companies specializing in fishing drones, leading to legal battles currently in the appeal court. The outcome will shape the future management of drone fishing practices within South Africa.

Envisioning a Balanced Future

Anticipating a positive outcome from ongoing legal deliberations, researchers aspire to see improved monitoring and management of South Africa’s recreational fishery. The ultimate aim is to ensure equitable resource allocation, prioritizing those reliant on fishing for sustenance and livelihoods.

The evolving landscape of drone fishing in South Africa underscores the critical need for balancing innovation with environmental preservation and societal equity. As the legal tussle continues, the nation grapples with the complexities of adapting new technologies while safeguarding its coastal ecosystems and fishing communities.

Join Our Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter and stay updated.

Sponsored

Start trading with a free $30 bonus

Unleash your trading potential with XM—your gateway to the electric world of financial markets! Get a staggering $30 trading bonus right off the bat, with no deposit required. Dive into a sea of opportunities with access to over 1000 instruments on the most cutting-edge XM platforms. Trade with zest, at your own pace, anytime, anywhere. Don't wait, your trading journey begins now! Click here to ignite your trading spirit!

Miriam Matoma

Miriam is a freelance writer, she covers economics and government news for Rateweb. You can contact her on: Email: miriam@rateweb.co.za Twitter: @MatomaMiriam