Chinese Fast-Fashion Giant Shein Sued for Art Theft

  • Shein, a Chinese fast-fashion firm valued at $66 billion, is facing a lawsuit from designers for allegedly repeatedly stealing independent artists' works using an AI-powered "design algorithm."
  • The designers claim Shein's AI technology generates exact copies of their designs, potentially damaging their careers and violating their intellectual property rights.
  • The lawsuit cites the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), seeking to hold Shein accountable as a de-facto association of entities involved in the alleged misconduct.

In a high-stakes legal battle that transcends borders, a group of designers, Krista Perry, Larissa Martinez, and Jay Baron, have taken on Chinese fast-fashion firm Shein, valued at a staggering $66 billion, over claims of repeatedly stealing independent artists’ works and utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) in its design process. The lawsuit alleges a long and continuous pattern of racketeering, which the designers say could greatly damage their careers.

The designers argue that Shein’s sophisticated “design ‘algorithm'” operates in a manner that generates exact copies of original designs, leaving independent artists vulnerable to serious harm. The alleged theft of designs with the highest commercial potential is particularly damaging, with Shein’s AI being smart enough to identify and replicate these profitable pieces.

Though the lawsuit highlights the use of AI in Shein’s design process, the specific methods employed by the company remain unclear. Contrary to generating the alleged copies through AI, the designers claim that Shein’s technology facilitates the replication of their works, leading to an ongoing breach of their intellectual property rights.

At the heart of this legal battle is the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), enacted in 1970 and originally used against the notorious American Mafia. The designers assert that Shein’s practices fall within the purview of RICO, as the alleged misconduct is committed by a de-facto association of entities rather than a single entity. Seeking a jury trial, the designers aim to hold all responsible parties within the fast-fashion giant accountable for their actions.

In response to TechCrunch’s inquiries, Shein issued a boilerplate statement, assuring that the company takes these claims seriously and vows to “vigorously defend” itself. However, if found guilty, the consequences could be severe for the company and its operations.

With an approximate exchange rate of $1 to ZAR 18, Shein’s astronomical valuation places it among the fastest-growing online retailers globally. Despite this, the company has not been immune to allegations of exploiting workers and violating local labor laws. Shein has faced previous scrutiny over its labor practices, which has led to tarnished reputations and calls for greater corporate accountability.

Notably, Shein has endeavoured to market itself as an environmentally responsible and socially conscious firm, attempting to offset its controversial reputation. Nevertheless, a recent marketing campaign aimed at aligning itself with influencers ended up backfiring, amplifying concerns about the company’s practices and intentions.

Visited 1 times, 1 visit(s) today
Do you have a news tip for Rateweb reporters? Please email us at

Sponsored

Start trading with a free $30 bonus

Trade stocks, forex, commodities, metals and CFDs on stock indices with an internationally licensed and regulated broker. For all clients who open their first real account, XM offers a $30 trading bonus without any initial deposit needed. Learn more about how you can trade over 1000 instruments on the XM MT4 and MT5 platforms from your PC and Mac, or from a variety of mobile devices.

Related

Rateweb

South Africa’s primary source of financial tools and information

Contact Us

admin@rateweb.co.za

Disclaimer

Rateweb strives to keep its information accurate and up to date. This information may be different than what you see when you visit a financial institution, service provider or specific product’s site. All financial products, shopping products and services are presented without warranty. When evaluating offers, please review the financial institution’s Terms and Conditions.

Rateweb is not a financial service provider and should in no way be seen as one. In compiling the articles for our website due caution was exercised in an attempt to gather information from reliable and accurate sources. The articles are of a general nature and do not purport to offer specialised and or personalised financial or investment advice. Neither the author, nor the publisher, will accept any responsibility for losses, omissions, errors, fortunes or misfortunes that may be suffered by any person that acts or refrains from acting as a result of these articles.