SIU’s Fight Against Corruption in State Institutions Faces Hurdle

  • The Special Investigating Unit (SIU) is facing a legal challenge after a High Court ruling declared its authorization to investigate Telkom's affairs as unconstitutional and invalid.
  • The court's decision questioned Telkom's classification as a State Institution, which could potentially shield some public entities from SIU investigations.
  • The SIU is considering legal options and may appeal the ruling to seek clarification on what constitutes a state institution, crucial for its mission to combat corruption and maladministration across all State Institutions.
SIU's Fight Against Corruption

The Special Investigating Unit (SIU) is currently weighing its legal options following a significant ruling by the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division Pretoria, regarding the Unit’s investigation into the affairs of Telkom, the country’s prominent telecommunications provider. The ruling, which declared Proclamation 49 of 2022 as unconstitutional, invalid, and of no force or effect, has sparked discussions around what constitutes a state institution and how it impacts the SIU’s authority in probing corruption and maladministration.

Proclamation 49 of 2022 was the authorization granted to the SIU to investigate allegations of serious maladministration, malpractice, and possible corruption within Telkom. However, the High Court’s judgment questioned the company’s classification as a State Institution and subsequently dismissed the SIU’s ability to investigate its affairs.

Under the Special Investigating Units and Special Tribunals Act 74 of 1996, the SIU is vested with the power to investigate allegations of corruption and maladministration within State Institutions. These institutions typically include government departments, municipalities, and state-owned entities. The SIU’s mandate is to recover financial losses suffered by the state and prevent any further losses due to corruption and malpractice.

The recent court ruling has sparked concerns within the SIU regarding the interpretation of what constitutes a state institution. To effectively combat corruption and maladministration across all State Institutions, the SIU believes that a clear definition of such institutions is essential. Without this clarity, there is a risk that certain public entities may inadvertently evade investigation by the SIU.

In light of the judgment, the SIU believes that seeking clarification on the definition of a state institution is crucial to the success of their efforts in rooting out corruption and maladministration. The Unit is committed to ensuring that all public entities, regardless of their legal status, are held accountable for their actions and that no entity is beyond the reach of investigation.

As the SIU reviews the judgment, it is considering all legal options available to it. The possibility of appealing the ruling is being evaluated as the Unit seeks to have the issue of the “state institution” definitively settled by a higher court. Such a resolution would provide legal clarity on the matter and set a precedent for future investigations involving entities that may fall into a similar grey area.

It is evident that the SIU remains steadfast in its dedication to combating corruption and maladministration within the country’s institutions. The Unit’s work is integral to safeguarding the financial interests of the state and fostering a culture of accountability among public entities.

The SIU’s pursuit of legal clarity on the definition of a state institution is commendable, as it underscores the importance of a robust and unambiguous legal framework in the fight against corruption. By seeking a resolution through the courts, the SIU is demonstrating its commitment to maintaining the integrity of its investigations and ensuring that no entity can hide behind legal ambiguities to evade scrutiny.

Visited 1 times, 1 visit(s) today

Stay ahead in the financial world – Sign Up to Rateweb’s essential newsletter for free. Get the latest insights on business trends, tech innovations, and market movements, directly to your inbox. Join our community of savvy readers and never miss an update that could impact your financial decisions.

Do you have a news tip for Rateweb reporters? Please email us at


Start trading with a free $30 bonus

Trade stocks, forex, commodities, metals and CFDs on stock indices with an internationally licensed and regulated broker. For all clients who open their first real account, XM offers a $30 trading bonus without any initial deposit needed. Learn more about how you can trade over 1000 instruments on the XM MT4 and MT5 platforms from your PC and Mac, or from a variety of mobile devices.


Personal Financial Tools

Below is a list of tools built to assist South Africans to make the best financial decisions:



South Africa’s primary source of financial tools and information

Contact Us


Rateweb strives to keep its information accurate and up to date. This information may be different than what you see when you visit a financial institution, service provider or specific product’s site. All financial products, shopping products and services are presented without warranty. When evaluating offers, please review the financial institution’s Terms and Conditions.

Rateweb is not a financial service provider and should in no way be seen as one. In compiling the articles for our website due caution was exercised in an attempt to gather information from reliable and accurate sources. The articles are of a general nature and do not purport to offer specialised and or personalised financial or investment advice. Neither the author, nor the publisher, will accept any responsibility for losses, omissions, errors, fortunes or misfortunes that may be suffered by any person that acts or refrains from acting as a result of these articles.